ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2024
Does commonly used femoral components of total knee arthroplasty fit well in the Indian population?
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: 20 % of patients remain dissatisfied post-Total Knee Arthroplasty. We intend to find the correlation between sizes of commonly used femoral components and morphometric data of distal femur in Indian population. Materials and methods: Prospective observational study in 178 knees (178 individuals) was conducted on Magnetic Resonance Imaging scans (Axial section). The anteroposterior dimension at intercondylar notch (AP), anteroposterior dimension on the medial (MAP) and lateral (LAP) femoral condyle, total mediolateral width (ML), width of medial condyle (MLM), lateral condyle (MLL) and intercondylar distance (ICD) and aspect ratio (AR) were measured on males and females separately. These measurements were then analyzed keeping in view the available sizes of three latest knee arthroplasty systems (Attune CR, Next Gen II, Genesis II) to look for correlation and best fitting system. Results: On observation between values of male and female femur, a significant difference was seen in all the parameters (p-value<0.0001) except ICD (p-value 0.6591). On scatter plots, Attune was found to be nearer to the line of best fit compared to other two implant companies in both males and females. Outliers were highest in cases of NextGen II (45 % in males and 46 % in females) whereas it was lowest in the case of Attune (12.5 %in males and 41 % in females). Conclusion: Attune CR was seen to fit best in the Indian population followed by Genesis II and NextGen II. These femoral implants are designed as per the sizes of the Western population and the Caucasians are oversized for the Indian subcontinent, especially female patients, thus needing improvement in design/sizes. Level of evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.