ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2024
Single-leg versus double-leg hip spica casts in the management of paediatric femoral shaft fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Paediatric femoral shaft fractures can be managed with single- or double-leg hip spica casting between ages six-months and six-years. The aim of this review was to determine if single-leg hip spicas reduce the impact on family life without compromising fracture stability. Methods: The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023454309). MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinical trial registers were searched to May 2023 for level I-III evidence. Primary outcomes were impact on family life and fracture stability. Where appropriate, Meta-analysis was completed using RevMan v5.4. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 (RCTs) and ROBINS-I (non-RCTs). Certainty of evidence was measured with GRADE. Results: From 234 identified papers, four met the inclusion criteria (two RCTs; two non-RCTs). A total of 339 children were included (single-leg spica: 176; double-leg spica: 163). Three studies were 'high risk' and one study 'moderate risk' of bias. Impact on family life parameters were too heterogenous for pooled meta-analysis. Non-pooled data identified significantly more missed work days in the double-leg spica group and the 'Impact on Family' Scale significantly favoured single-leg spicas. For fracture stability, meta-analysis identified that (i) mal-union rates were significantly lower in single-leg spica: OR 0.08 (95 % CI 0.01 to 0.69; p = 0.02); (ii) MUA in theatre was not significantly different: OR 0.97 (95 % CI 0.19 to 4.86; p = 0.97); and (iii) wedge adjustment was not significantly different: OR 3.46 (95 % CI 0.48 to 24.92; p = 0.22). Certainty of evidence was assessed as 'very low'. Conclusion: Single-leg hip spicas may be associated with reduced impact on family life without compromising fracture stability compared with double-leg hip spicas. However, the evidence is weak. Therefore, a propensity score matched observational study is required to understand if subgroups of patients (age, fracture pattern, mechanism of injury) would benefit from a single- or double-leg hip spica.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.