ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Instance-level medical image classification for text-based retrieval in a medical data integration center.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Biomedical Datasets to Fairness-Aware Recommendations: An Integrated Data Orchestration Pipeline for Binary Clinical Predictions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Exploring transformer models: Fine-tuning VS inference on relation extraction from biomedical texts.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Standardizing DICOM annotation: deep learning enhances body part description in X-ray image retrieval for clinical research.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A medical data integration center integrates a large volume of medical images from clinical departments, including X-rays, CT scans, and MRI scans. Ideally, all images should be indexed appropriately with standard clinical terms. However, some images have incorrect or missing annotations, which creates challenges in searching and integrating data centrally. To address this issue, accurate and meaningful descriptors are needed for indexing fields, enabling users to efficiently search for desired images and integrate them with international standards. This paper aims to provide concise annotation for missing or incorrectly indexed fields, incorporating essential instance-level information such as radiology modalities (e.g., X-rays), anatomical regions (e.g., chest), and body orientations (e.g., lateral) using a Deep Learning classification model - ResNet50. To demonstrate the capabilities of our algorithm in generating annotations for indexing fields, we conducted three experiments using two open-source datasets, the ROCO dataset, and the IRMA dataset, along with a custom dataset featuring SNOMED CT labels. While the outcomes of these experiments are satisfactory (Precision of >75%) for less critical tasks and serve as a valuable testing ground for image retrieval, they also underscore the need for further exploration of potential challenges. This essay elaborates on the identified issues and presents well-founded recommendations for refining and advancing our proposed approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.