Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38975272›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and animal science2024

Porcine skeletal muscle typing in histochemical and in-situ RT-PCR analysis.

Tao Lin, Zhun Liu, Fawen Dai, Hechuan Wang, Jianjun Zuo

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tao LinCollege of Life Science, Leshan Normal University, Sichuan, 61400, China.
Zhun LiuCollege of Life Science, Leshan Normal University, Sichuan, 61400, China.
Fawen DaiCollege of Life Science, Leshan Normal University, Sichuan, 61400, China.
Hechuan WangGuang'an Xinnong Development Co., Ltd, Guang'an, 638000, China.
Jianjun ZuoSouth China Agricultural University, Guangdong, 510000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there are plenty of histochemical methods to classify pig muscle fibers, which confused the naming and classification of muscle fibers. This study aims to analyze the difference and correlation of 6 different histochemical methods and select the most suitable method for muscle fiber classification at the molecular and histomological levels by in-situ RT-PCR and enzyme histochemical methods. Muscle fiber samples, including psoas (PM), semitendinosus (SM) and trapezius muscle (TM), were collected from Large Spotted (LS), Lantang (LT) and Landrace (LR) pigs at their market-ages (LS at 150 d, LT at 210 d, and LR at 150 d). 6 kinds of histochemical methods combining actomyosin adenosine triphosphatase (AM-ATPase) with succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme were conducted to differentiate fiber types. 2 types of fibers (I and II) were differentiated by acid 2-fibre (2-AC) or alkaline 2-fibre classification(2-AL), 3 types of fibers (βR, αR and αW) by 3-AC or 3-AL, and 4 types of fibers (I, IIa, IIx and IIb) by 4-AC, or 4-AL. Results showed that AC and AL muscle-fiber classification were consistent in reflecting the characteristics of muscle fibers(

Indexed as

Enzyme histochemistryIn-situ RT-PCRMuscle fiber classificationPigs

Identifiers

PMID38975272
PMCPMC11225689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.