ArticleHeliyon2024
The impact of neutrophil count on the results of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in immunocompromised febrile children.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has revolutionized the detection of pathogens, particularly in immunocompromised individuals such as pediatric patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This study aims to explore the impact of neutrophil count on the diagnostic efficacy of mNGS in diagnosing infections in pediatric patients with febrile diseases. We conducted a retrospective analysis of pediatric patients with febrile diseases in the hematology/oncology department from January 2019 to September 2022. The study included 387 patients with 516 febrile episodes. Analyzing data from 516 pediatric cases, our study found that 70.7 % had febrile neutropenia (FN) and 29.3 % had febrile without neutropenia (FWN). mNGS demonstrated a high positive detection rate of 84.9 %, compared to 29.7 % for conventional microbiological tests (CMT). While the positive detection rates of mNGS were similar in both FN and FWN groups, bacterial pathogens were more frequently detected in FN patients. Furthermore, the rate of identifying a "probable" microbial etiology was lower in the FN group (46.8 %) compared to the FWN group (65.6 %, p<0.001). When analyzing the types of organisms and specimens, the "probable" identification rates were particularly lower for viruses and fungi detected by mNGS, as well as in blood and nasopharyngeal swab samples. These findings underscore the significant influence of neutrophil counts on mNGS results in pediatric febrile patients and highlight the necessity for tailored diagnostic approaches in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.