ReviewHeliyon2024
Enhancing the properties of swelling soils with lime, fly ash, and expanded polystyrene -A review.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Prediction of unconfined compressive strength of fly ash and waste paper sludge stabilized clayey soil using explainable machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mechanistic and comparative laboratory assessment of lime dosage and uniaxial geogrid on the strength and durability of classified lateritic subgrade.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating the mechanical behavior of plastic waste modified asphalt using optimized machine learning approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Effects of Lime and Cement Addition on the Compaction and Shear Strength Parameters of Silty Soils.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sustainable heavy metal immobilization in contaminated soils using plant-derived urease-driven biomineralization.PloS one · 2025Article
- Predicting bentonite swelling pressure: optimized XGBoost versus neural networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper discusses efforts made by past researchers to steady the expansive (problematic) soils using mechanical and chemical techniques - specifically with EPS beads, lime and fly ash. Administering swelling of problematic soils is critical for civil engineers to prevent structural distress. This paper summarizes studies on reduction of swelling potential using EPS, lime and fly ash individually. Chemical stabilization with lime and fly ash are conventional methods for expansive soil stabilization, with known merits and demerits. This paper explores the suitability of different materials under various conditions and stabilization mechanisms, including cation exchange, flocculation, and pozzolanic reactions. The degree of stabilization is influenced by various factors such as the type and amount of additives, soil mineralogy, curing temperature, moisture content during molding, and the presence of nano-silica, organic matter, and sulfates. Additionally, expanded polystyrene (EPS) improves structural integrity by compressing when surrounded clay swells, reducing overall swelling. Thus, EPS addresses limitations of chemicals by mechanical means. Combining EPS, lime and fly ash creates a customized system promoting efficient, long-lasting, cost-effective and eco-friendly soil stabilization. Chemicals address EPS limitations like poor stabilization. This paper benefits civil engineers seeking to control expansive soil swelling and prevent structural distress. It indicates potential of an EPS-lime-fly ash system and concludes by identifying research gaps for further work on such combinatorial stabilizer systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.