Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38975161›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Enhancing the properties of swelling soils with lime, fly ash, and expanded polystyrene -A review.

Utkarsh, Pradeep Kumar Jain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

UtkarshDepartment of Civil Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, 462003, India.
Pradeep Kumar JainDepartment of Civil Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, 462003, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper discusses efforts made by past researchers to steady the expansive (problematic) soils using mechanical and chemical techniques - specifically with EPS beads, lime and fly ash. Administering swelling of problematic soils is critical for civil engineers to prevent structural distress. This paper summarizes studies on reduction of swelling potential using EPS, lime and fly ash individually. Chemical stabilization with lime and fly ash are conventional methods for expansive soil stabilization, with known merits and demerits. This paper explores the suitability of different materials under various conditions and stabilization mechanisms, including cation exchange, flocculation, and pozzolanic reactions. The degree of stabilization is influenced by various factors such as the type and amount of additives, soil mineralogy, curing temperature, moisture content during molding, and the presence of nano-silica, organic matter, and sulfates. Additionally, expanded polystyrene (EPS) improves structural integrity by compressing when surrounded clay swells, reducing overall swelling. Thus, EPS addresses limitations of chemicals by mechanical means. Combining EPS, lime and fly ash creates a customized system promoting efficient, long-lasting, cost-effective and eco-friendly soil stabilization. Chemicals address EPS limitations like poor stabilization. This paper benefits civil engineers seeking to control expansive soil swelling and prevent structural distress. It indicates potential of an EPS-lime-fly ash system and concludes by identifying research gaps for further work on such combinatorial stabilizer systems.

Indexed as

Black cotton soilCation exchange capacityDouble diffused layerExpanded polystyreneFly-ashLimeMontmorilloniteSpecific surface areaSwelling pressure

Identifiers

PMID38975161
PMCPMC11226918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.