Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38975148›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A stepwise prediction and interpretation of gestational diabetes mellitus: Foster the practical application of machine learning in clinical decision.

Fang Zhou, Xiao Ran, Fangliang Song, Qinglan Wu, Yuan Jia, Ying Liang, Suichen Chen, Guojun Zhang, Jie Dong, Yukun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Artificial Intelligence in Gestational Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fang ZhouDepartment of Pharmacy, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, PR China.
Xiao RanSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, PR China.
Fangliang SongSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, PR China.
Qinglan WuDepartment of Pharmacy, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, PR China.
Yuan JiaDepartment of Pharmacy, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, PR China.
Ying LiangSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, PR China.
Suichen ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, PR China.
Guojun ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, PR China.
Jie DongXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, PR China.
Yukun WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Machine learning has shown to be an effective method for early prediction and intervention of Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), which greatly decreases GDM incidence, reduces maternal and infant complications and improves the prognosis. However, there is still much room for improvement in data quality, feature dimension, and accuracy. The contributions and mechanism explanations of clinical data at different pregnancy stages to the prediction accuracy are still lacking. More importantly, current models still face notable obstacles in practical applications due to the complex and diverse input features and difficulties in redeployment. As a result, a simple, practical but accurate enough model is urgently needed. Design and methods: In this study, 2309 samples from two public hospitals in Shenzhen, China were collected for analysis. Different algorithms were systematically compared to build a robust and stepwise prediction system (level A to C) based on advanced machine learning, and models under different levels were interpreted. Results: XGBoost reported the best performance with ACC of 0.922, 0.859 and 0.850, AUC of 0.974, 0.924 and 0.913 for the selected level A to C models in the test set, respectively. Tree-based feature importance and SHAP method successfully identified the commonly recognized risk factors, while indicated new inconsistent impact trends for GDM in different stages of pregnancy. Conclusion: A stepwise prediction system was successfully established. A practical tool that enables a quick prediction of GDM was released at https://github.com/ifyoungnet/MedGDM.This study is expected to provide a more detailed profiling of GDM risk and lay the foundation for the application of the model in practice.

Indexed as

Computational medicineGestational diabetes mellitusMachine learningModel explanationRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID38975148
PMCPMC11225730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.