ArticleHeliyon2024
Unveiling a cuproptosis-related risk model and the role of FARSB in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SLC16A3 links tumor metabolism to therapeutic opportunities in hepatocellular carcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Exercise-related immune gene signature for hepatocellular carcinoma: machine learning and multi-omics analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cuproptosis, a type of regulated cell death that was recently identified, has been linked to the development of a variety of diseases, among them being cancers. Nevertheless, the prognostic significance and therapeutic implications of the cuproptosis potential index in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain uncertain. Methods: Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) and Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) methodology was conducted to ascertain the identification of modular genes that are closely linked to cuproptosis. In addition, the gene signature indicative of prognosis was formulated by employing univariate Cox regression analysis in conjunction with a random forest algorithm. The efficacy of this gene signature in predicting outcomes was confirmed through validation in both The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) datasets. Furthermore, a study was undertaken to evaluate the association between the risk score and various clinical-pathological characteristics, explore the biological processes linked to the gene signature, and analyze tumor mutational burden and somatic mutations. Lastly, potential drugs targeting the identified gene signature were identified through screening. Results: The results of our comprehensive analysis across multiple cancer types demonstrated a positive correlation between an elevated cuproptosis potential index (CPI) and an accelerated rate of tumor progression. Furthermore, employing the WGCNA technique, we successfully identified 640 genes associated with cuproptosis. Among these genes, we meticulously screened and validated a seven-gene signature (TCOF1, NOP58, TMEM69, FARSB, DHX37, SLC16A3, and CBX2) that exhibited substantial prognostic significance. Using the median risk score, the division of HCC patients into cohorts with high- and low-risk highlighted significant disparities in survival results, wherein the group with higher risk exhibited a less favorable overall survival. The risk score exhibited commendable predictive efficacy. Moreover, the Conclusion: Our research has successfully identified a strong seven-gene signature linked to cuproptosis, which could be utilized for prognostic evaluation and risk stratification in patients with HCC. Furthermore, the discovered gene signature, coupled with the functional analysis of FARSB, presents promising prospects as potential targets for therapeutic interventions in HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.