ArticleHeliyon2024
Association between the recommended volume of leisure-time physical activity and erectile dysfunction: A cross-sectional analysis of the national health and nutrition examination survey, 2001-2004.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wearable technology-derived digital biomarkers for non-invasive assessment of erectile dysfunction: a cross-sectional pilot study.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Association of relative fat mass with prevalence of erectile dysfunction in US men: an analysis of NHANES 2001-2004.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Physical activity-related interventions alleviate the severity of erectile dysfunction (ED), but it is unknown whether the recommended volume of physical activity (PA) or a higher level of physical activity reduces the likelihood of ED in adult males. We aimed to evaluate the association between the recommended volume of PA and ED among US male adults. Design: A nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Setting: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2004. Participants: A total of 2509 men aged ≥20 years were enrolled. Primary and secondary outcome measures: ED and PA were assessed by a standardised self-report questionnaire. Weighted logistic regression analysis and spline fitting were used to assess the relationship between PA volume and the odds of ED. Results: Among 2509 US adult males, the mean (standard error) age was 43.7 (0.46) years. A total of 61.1 % of men reached the recommended volume of aerobic PA. Compared with participants not meeting the PA guidelines, individuals who had recommended aerobic activities demonstrated a 34 % reduction in the odds of having ED (OR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.48-0.90; p = 0.011). Notably, according to the restricted cubic spline, we revealed a dose‒response pattern between PA volume and reduced odds of ED, even when exceeding the recommended PA levels. When compared to males with moderate-equivalent PA of less than 150 min/week, the odds of ED in those with moderate-equivalent PA levels of 150-300 min/week and >300 min/week decreased by 22 % and 39 %, respectively. Compared with participants who did not meet the PA guidelines, the multivariable-adjusted ORs (95 % CIs) of ED associated with adequate PA volumes were 0.37 (0.22-0.61) among non-smokers and 0.85 (0.57-1.25) among current smokers ( Conclusions and Relevance: Our findings supported the benefit of meeting the guideline-recommended PA equivalents or higher volumes for ED prevention. However, PA-related benefit might be significantly diminished by smoking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.