ArticleHeliyon2024
A multi-criteria decision analysis approach for ranking the performance of CMIP6 models in reproducing precipitation patterns over Abaya-Chamo sub-basin, Ethiopia.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The most suitable multi-model ensemble set of general circulation models is used to reduce the uncertainty associated with GCM selection and improve the accuracy of the model simulations. This study evaluated the performance of 20 global climate models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) in reproducing precipitation patterns over the Abaya-Chamo Sub-basin, Ethiopia. For the validation and selection of the models' capabilities, datasets from the Climate Hazards Infrared Precipitation with Stations (CHIRPS) were used after comparing them with ground observational datasets. The objective was to identify the most suitable multi-model ensemble (MME) of a subset of CMIP6 GCMs to capture the rainfall for the 1981-2014 period over the region. Climate Data Operators (CDOs) were used in climate data processing and extraction, and the Mann-Kendall test and Theil-Sen slope estimator methods were utilized to analyze the trends of the CMIP6 simulations. Four statistical metrics (Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient, percent bias, normalized root mean square error, and Kling-Gupta efficiency) were used to further assess the performance of the models. A multi-criteria decision analysis approach, namely, the technique for order preferences by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method, was used to obtain the overall ranks of CMIP6 models and to select the best-performing CMIP6 model in the region. The results indicated that CHIRPS and most of the CMIP6 simulations generally reproduced bimodal precipitation patterns over the region. The CESM2-WACCM, NorESM2-MM, NorESM2-LM, and NorESM2-LM models performed better than the other models in reproducing seasonal patterns for the winter, spring, summer, and autumn seasons, respectively. On the other hand, FGOALS-f3-L revealed the trends of the reference datasets for all seasons. In terms of the NSE, PB, NRMSE, and KGE metrics, EC-Earth3-C, EC-Earth3, EC-Earth3-C, and EC-Earth-C, respectively, were considered good at representing the observed features of precipitation over the region. EC-Earth3-C,EC-Earth3, EC-Earth3-Veg-LR, ACCESS-CM2, MPI-ESM1-2-HR, and CNRM-CM6-1-HR exhibited the best performances in the Abaya-Chamo Sub-basin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.