Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38975107›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Application of machine learning approach on halal meat authentication principle, challenges, and prospects: A review.

Abdul Mustapha, Iskandar Ishak, Nor Nadiha Mohd Zaki, Mohammad Rashedi Ismail-Fitry, Syariena Arshad, Awis Qurni Sazili

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abdul MustaphaHalal Products Research Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Iskandar IshakHalal Products Research Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Nor Nadiha Mohd ZakiHalal Products Research Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohammad Rashedi Ismail-FitryHalal Products Research Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Syariena ArshadHalal Products Research Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Awis Qurni SaziliHalal Products Research Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meat is a source of essential amino acids that are necessary for human growth and development, meat can come from dead, alive, Halal, or non-Halal animal species which are intentionally or economically (adulteration) sold to consumers. Sharia has prohibited the consumption of pork by Muslims. Because of the activities of adulterators in recent times, consumers are aware of what they eat. In the past, several methods were employed for the authentication of Halal meat, but numerous drawbacks are attached to this method such as lack of flexibility, limited application, time,consumption and low level of accuracy and sensitivity. Machine Learning (ML) is the concept of learning through the development and application of algorithms from given data and making predictions or decisions without being explicitly programmed. The techniques compared with traditional methods in Halal meat authentication are fast, flexible, scaled, automated, less expensive, high accuracy and sensitivity. Some of the ML approaches used in Halal meat authentication have proven a high percentage of accuracy in meat authenticity while other approaches show no evidence of Halal meat authentication for now. The paper critically highlighted some of the principles, challenges, successes, and prospects of ML approaches in the authentication of Halal meat.

Indexed as

AdulterationAuthenticationHalal meatMachine learningSupervisedUnsupervised

Identifiers

PMID38975107
PMCPMC11225673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.