ArticleHeliyon2024
Application of Monte Carlo simulation to optimise the dosage regimen of meropenem in patients with augmented renal clearance for
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sepsis-Specific Risk Factors for Augmented Renal Clearance (ARC) and the Effect of Inflammation on Duration of ARC in Patients with Sepsis: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target attainment analyses as support for meropenem dosing regimens in critically ill adult and elderly patients withFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Precision Dosing of Meropenem in Adults with Normal Renal Function: Insights from a Population Pharmacokinetic and Monte Carlo Simulation Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To optimise the dosing regimen of meropenem for treating Methods: This research involves an MCS based on PK data from patients with ARC and a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution of PA. This study simplifies the methods section, focusing on the critical aspects of simulation and target values for effective treatment. Results: The study highlights key findings and emphasises that tailored dosing based on bacterial MIC values is essential for patients with ARC. It also notes that empirical treatment in patients with ARC should consider the MIC distribution, with 2 g every (q) 6 h administered to achieve the PK/PD target, while 3 g q 6 h is effective in inhibiting resistance. Conclusion: Tailored dosing based on bacterial MIC values is crucial for patients with ARC. Prolonged infusion time alone does not enhance efficacy. Empirical treatment in patients with ARC should consider MIC distribution; a dosage of 2 g q 6 h achieves the PK/PD target, while 3 g q 6 h (≥12 g daily) inhibits resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.