Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38975061›Full record

ArticleResearch and reports in urology2024

Efficacy of Three Different Injection Techniques for the Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux (VUR) in Children: A Review of 10 Years of Experience.

Giulia Lanfranchi, Irene Paraboschi, Ugo Maria Pierucci, Guglielmo Mantica, Sara Costanzo, Federica Marinoni, Andrea Pansini, Giorgio Giuseppe Orlando Selvaggio, Gloria Pelizzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and reports in urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giulia LanfranchiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, 20154, Italy.
Irene ParaboschiDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L Sacco", University of Milano, Milan, 20157, Italy.
Ugo Maria PierucciDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, 20154, Italy.
Guglielmo ManticaDepartment of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, 16131, Italy.
Sara CostanzoDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, 20154, Italy.
Federica MarinoniDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, 20154, Italy.
Andrea PansiniDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, 20154, Italy.
Giorgio Giuseppe Orlando SelvaggioDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, 20154, Italy.
Gloria PelizzoDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, 20154, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To review our 10 years of experience with the endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children, emphasizing the long-term efficacy of the "combined STING-HIT" technique. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed including all children with symptomatic VUR undergoing the cystoscopic injection of bulking agents from January 2013 to December 2022 in our pediatric tertiary referral center. Three different endoscopic techniques were adopted: the "combined STING-HIT" technique, the STING technique, and the HIT technique. Treatment success was defined as symptom remission and VUR resolution on the voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) performed at the 3-month follow-up. Results: In the study period, 140 (F:M = 64:76) patients and 228 ureters were treated at a median patient age of 3 (2.0-6.0) years. After a single endoscopic treatment, VUR resolved in 203 (88%) ureters. The VUR resolution rate after a single endoscopic treatment was 95% (n=70/74) in case of I-II VUR, 88% (n=87/99) in case of III VUR; 83% (n=38/46) in case of IV VUR; 89% (n=8/9) in case of V VUR (p-value: 0.174). Overall, one or two endoscopic treatments succeeded in 219 (96%) ureters. The overall VUR resolution rate following one or two endoscopic treatments was 100% (74/74) in case of I-II VUR, 93% (n=92/99) in case of III VUR; 96% (n=44/46) in case of IV VUR; 100% (n=9/9) in case of V VUR (p-value: 0.083). Despite not being statistically significant, the VUR resolution rate was higher for the "combined STING-HIT" technique, both after one (92%: n=110/119; versus 85%; n=62/73 versus 86%; n=31/36; p-value: 0.225) or two (98%: n=116/119; versus 95%; n=69/73 versus 94%; n=34/36; p-value: 0.469) endoscopic treatments. Conclusion: The endoscopic approaches were highly successful for the treatment of VUR in children. The "combined STING-HIT" technique was a safe and effective procedure, being associated with the higher resolution rate.

Indexed as

endoscopic techniqueinjection techniquepediatricsvesicoureteral reflux

Identifiers

PMID38975061
PMCPMC11227862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.