Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38975047›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2024

Virtual simulation training for postpartum hemorrhage in low-to-moderate-volume hospitals in the US.

Kathleen C Minor, Katherine Bianco, Jonathan A Mayo, Gillian Abir, Amy E Judy, Henry C Lee, Stephanie A Leonard, Stephany Ayotte, Laura C Hedli, Kristen Schaffer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. FIGO recommendations on objective measurement of blood loss after birth for early detection of postpartum hemorrhage.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kathleen C MinorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Obstetrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (Dr Minor, Dr Bianco, Mr Mayo, Dr Judy, and Dr Leonard).
Katherine BiancoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Obstetrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (Dr Minor, Dr Bianco, Mr Mayo, Dr Judy, and Dr Leonard).
Jonathan A MayoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Obstetrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (Dr Minor, Dr Bianco, Mr Mayo, Dr Judy, and Dr Leonard).
Gillian AbirDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Obstetric Anesthesiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (Dr Abir).
Amy E JudyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Obstetrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (Dr Minor, Dr Bianco, Mr Mayo, Dr Judy, and Dr Leonard).
Henry C LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA (Dr Lee and Ms Schaffer).
Stephanie A LeonardDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine & Obstetrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (Dr Minor, Dr Bianco, Mr Mayo, Dr Judy, and Dr Leonard).
Stephany AyotteJohnson Center for Pregnancy and Newborn Services, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford, CA (Ms Ayotte).
Laura C HedliDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (Ms Hedli and Ms Sie).
Kristen SchafferDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA (Dr Lee and Ms Schaffer).
Lillian SieDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (Ms Hedli and Ms Sie).
Kay DanielsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (Dr Daniels).

Funding

Stanford PRIHSM: Promoting Improvement in Hemorrhage-related Severe Maternal MorbidityU54HD113142 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Deirdre Lyell · 2023 to 2026
$11.0M
In situ simulation of neonatal resuscitation to improve team performance and clinical outcomesR01HD087425 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, HENRY CHONG · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Optimizing treatment of chronic hypertension in pregnancy using a national distributed data networkK01HL171699 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Stephanie A. Leonard · 2024 to 2026
$514k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL171699NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD087425NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD113142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Maternal mortality in the United States is rising and many deaths are preventable. Emergencies, such as postpartum hemorrhage, occur less frequently in non-teaching, rural, and urban low-birth volume hospitals. There is an urgent need for accessible, evidence-based, and sustainable inter-professional education that creates the opportunity for clinical teams to practice their response to rare, but potentially devastating events. Objective: To assess the feasibility of virtual simulation training for the management of postpartum hemorrhage in low-to-moderate-volume delivery hospitals. Study design: The study occurred between December 2021 and March 2022 within 8 non-academic hospitals in the United States with low-to-moderate-delivery volumes, randomized to one of two models: direct simulation training and train-the-trainer. In the direct simulation training model, simulation faculty conducted a virtual simulation training program with participants. In the train-the-trainer model, simulation faculty conducted virtual lessons with new simulation instructors on how to prepare and conduct a simulation course. Following this training, the instructors led their own simulation training program at their respective hospitals. The direct simulation training participants and students trained by new instructors from the train-the-trainer program were evaluated with a multiple-choice questionnaire on postpartum hemorrhage knowledge and a confidence and attitude survey at 3 timepoints: prior to, immediately after, and at 3 months post-training. Paired t-tests were performed to assess for changes in knowledge and confidence within teaching models across time points. ANOVA was performed to test cross-sectionally for differences in knowledge and confidence between teaching models at each time point. Results: Direct simulation training participants ( Conclusion: Virtual education for obstetric simulation training is feasible, acceptable, and effective. Utilizing a direct simulation model for postpartum hemorrhage management resulted in enhanced knowledge acquisition and retention compared to a train-the-trainer model.

Indexed as

educationemergencyinnovationlow-volumemoderate-volumemultidisciplinarynon-academicpostpartum hemorrhageruraltechnologytrain-the-trainer

Identifiers

PMID38975047
PMCPMC11227018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.