ArticleJPhys photonics2024
Functional effects of the spatial-varying lens mechanical properties in accommodation.
Article in JPhys photonics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical multimodal Brillouin microscopy-optical coherence elastography system for lens biomechanics.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Quantitative fs-laser crystalline lens softening surgery towards presbyopia treatment based on optical coherence elastography.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Article
- Biomechanical contributions to cataract development and implications for treatment strategies.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lens biomechanical properties are critical for our eyes to accommodate. While it is well understood that lens mechanical properties change with age, different experimental techniques have been used over the years, with varying results on how the lens modulus changes. In this study, we developed a spatial-varying elasticity model to characterize the overall elastic modulus of the lens and establish its effect on accommodation. First, to validate the model, ex vivo porcine lenses underwent compression testing using biopsy punches of different diameters to change the percentage of nucleus within samples. Importantly, we found that, indeed, changing nucleus/cortex spatial ratio produces dramatic (∼7-fold) increase in overall sample modulus. Comparing the model with human lens spatial ratios, we demonstrate how changing spatial mechanics are more influential than peak modulus changes on overall elastic modulus. Next, in vivo clinical measurements of the spatial-varying lens modulus were used to generate a simplified mechanical-optical model of accommodation. We defined an ellipsoid lens with patient-derived modulus and geometry measurements, and a statics simulation and ray tracing analysis were performed through the deformed and undeformed lens. The resulting accommodation estimates agree with general accommodation expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.