ArticleEngineering in life sciences2024
A perspective-driven and technical evaluation of machine learning in bioreactor scale-up: A case-study for potential model developments.
Article in Engineering in life sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Model-Enabled Knowledge Transfer Across Cell Lines, Culture Scales and Conditions.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Article
- A Review on Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Monoclonal Antibody (mAb) Manufacturing.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A perspective-driven and technical evaluation of machine learning in bioreactor scale-up: A case-study for potential model developments.Engineering in life sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioreactor scale-up and scale-down have always been a topical issue for the biopharmaceutical industry and despite considerable effort, the identification of a fail-safe strategy for bioprocess development across scales remains a challenge. With the ubiquitous growth of digital transformation technologies, new scaling methods based on computer models may enable more effective scaling. This study aimed to evaluate the potential application of machine learning (ML) algorithms for bioreactor scale-up, with a specific focus on the prediction of scaling parameters. Factors critical to the development of such models were identified and data for bioreactor scale-up studies involving CHO cell-generated mAb products collated from the literature and public sources for the development of unsupervised and supervised ML models. Comparison of bioreactor performance across scales identified similarities between the different processes and primary differences between small- and large-scale bioreactors. A series of three case studies were developed to assess the relationship between cell growth and scale-sensitive bioreactor features. An embedding layer improved the capability of artificial neural network models to predict cell growth at a large-scale, as this approach captured similarities between the processes. Further models constructed to predict scaling parameters demonstrated how ML models may be applied to assist the scaling process. The development of data sets that include more characterization data with greater variability under different gassing and agitation regimes will also assist the future development of ML tools for bioreactor scaling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.