Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38974972›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Integrated edge information and pathway topology for drug-disease associations.

Xianbin Li, Xiangzhen Zan, Tao Liu, Xiwei Dong, Haqi Zhang, Qizhang Li, Zhenshen Bao, Jie Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xianbin LiSchool of Computer and Big Data Science, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang, Jiangxi 332000, China.
Xiangzhen ZanInstitute of Computational Science and Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 520000, China.
Tao LiuSchool of Computer and Big Data Science, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang, Jiangxi 332000, China.
Xiwei DongSchool of Computer and Big Data Science, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang, Jiangxi 332000, China.
Haqi ZhangDepartment of Digital Media Technology, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China.
Qizhang LiInnovative Drug R&D Center, School of Life Sciences, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei, Anhui 235000, China.
Zhenshen BaoCollege of Information Engineering, Taizhou University, Taizhou 225300, Jiangsu, China.
Jie LinDepartment of Pharmacy, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325200, Zhejiang Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug repurposing is a promising approach to find new therapeutic indications for approved drugs. Many computational approaches have been proposed to prioritize candidate anticancer drugs by gene or pathway level. However, these methods neglect the changes in gene interactions at the edge level. To address the limitation, we develop a computational drug repurposing method (iEdgePathDDA) based on edge information and pathway topology. First, we identify drug-induced and disease-related edges (the changes in gene interactions) within pathways by using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Next, we calculate the inhibition score between drug-induced edges and disease-related edges. Finally, we prioritize drug candidates according to the inhibition score on all disease-related edges. Case studies show that our approach successfully identifies new drug-disease pairs based on CTD database. Compared to the state-of-the-art approaches, the results demonstrate our method has the superior performance in terms of five metrics across colorectal, breast, and lung cancer datasets.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsOncologyPharmacology

Identifiers

PMID38974972
PMCPMC11226970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.