ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2024
Potential asthma risk factors do not account for global asthma symptom prevalence patterns and time trends in children and adolescents.
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Socioeconomic, Behavioural, and Environmental Determinants of Asthma Inequalities in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study Using EHIS Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with self-reported asthma diagnosis in Makkah Region of Saudi Arabia.Medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence and determinants of allergic rhinitis among high school students exposed to industry allergens in Eastern Ethiopia.PloS one · 2025Article
- Exhale-Dx™: A non-invasive, real-time breath analysis system using deep learning for asthma diagnosis.Journal of biological methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) and the Global Asthma Network (GAN) conducted a series of global asthma prevalence surveys, between 1990 and 2020, in adolescents aged 13-14 and children aged 6-7 years. We used them to assess whether potential asthma risk factors explain global asthma symptom prevalence trends over this period. Method: We fitted mixed-effects linear regression models to estimate associations between centre-level risk factor prevalence and both the mid-point asthma symptom prevalence and the change per decade. We also estimated the 2019 asthma symptom prevalence across all included centres. Results: For adolescents, across 50 centres in 26 countries there was weak evidence that decreasing asthma prevalence over time was associated with regular fast-food consumption and frequent television viewing. However, frequent television viewing, along with heavy truck traffic, were associated with higher prevalence of asthma symptoms at the study mid-point. For children, across 41 centres in 21 countries, no risk factors were associated with time trends in asthma symptom prevalence, but truck traffic and paracetamol in the first year of life were associated with higher mid-point prevalence.We estimated the 2019 asthma symptom prevalence, across a total of 124 centres, to be 12.8% (11.4%, 14.2%) with little evidence of a difference by age. Low-income countries had lower prevalence (children 5.2% [2.5%, 7.8%], adolescents 5.3% [2.8%, 7.8%]), than lower-middle-, upper-middle- and high-income countries (all approximately 14-15%). Including risk factors in the models did not change the estimates. Conclusion: Potential asthma risk factors do not seem to explain the global prevalence patterns or time trends. Country income accounts for some of the differences, but the unexplained variation is very high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.