ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024
Check of APpropriaTeness of Antimicrobial therapy In Nursing homes (CAPTAIN):a point prevalence study in Belgium.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Behavioural Determinants of Appropriate Antibiotic Prescribing for Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Homes: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholders' Perspectives.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The overall prevalence of antimicrobial therapy (AMT) in nursing homes is well described. However, less is known about the appropriateness of AMT in nursing home residents. Therefore, the Check of APpropriaTeness of antimicrobial therapy in nursing homes (CAPTAIN) study aimed to assess both prevalence and appropriateness of AMT in Belgian nursing homes. Methods: In a prospective, observational, point prevalence study, researchers documented prevalence and identified potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) by evaluating accordance of AMT with national guidelines. The severity of inappropriateness was assessed by a modified Delphi expert panel. Results: Eleven nursing homes, including 1178 residents, participated in this study. On the survey day, 8.0% of residents took systemic AMT, primarily for urinary tract infections (54.2%), respiratory tract infections (36.5%), and skin and skin-structure infections (6.3%). About half of these prescriptions were used in prophylaxis (52.1%). Registration of indication and stop date was missing in 58.3% and 56.3% of AMTs, respectively. In 89.6% of the systemic AMTs, at least one discordance with national guidelines was identified, resulting in a total of 171 PIPs, with 49 unique PIPs. Of all unique PIPs, 26.5% were assessed with a high severity score (≥4). According to the expert panel, most inappropriate practice was starting AMT for cough without other symptoms. Inappropriate timing of time-dependent AMTs was common, but assessed as 'moderately severe'. One-third of systemic AMT exceeded the recommended duration. Conclusions: AMT in nursing homes is often not prescribed according to national guidelines, highlighting the need for future interventions to promote the rational use of AMT in this setting.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.