Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38974894›Full record

ArticleJournal of metabolic and bariatric surgery2024

Abdominal Drains After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Should They Be Used?

Lucía Aragone, Francisco Thibaud, Mariana Tóffolo, Matías Mihura, Daniel E Pirchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucía AragoneDepartment of General Surgery, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5957-6034
Francisco ThibaudDepartment of General Surgery, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8354-086X
Mariana TóffoloDepartment of General Surgery, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9893-2487
Matías MihuraDepartment of General Surgery, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7131-7951
Daniel E PirchiDepartment of General Surgery, Buenos Aires British Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7353-0470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide for the treatment of morbid obesity. Blake-type drains are widely used in this procedure despite the lack of clear evidence regarding their benefits in the diagnosis and treatment of common postoperative complications such as gastric suture line leak (GSLL) and postoperative bleeding (PB). Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study with prospective case registry was conducted, analyzing all patients who underwent LSG between January 2012 and December 2022 at a high-volume center. Our primary outcome was to evaluate the role of drains for diagnosis and treatment of GSLL and PB in LSG. Our secondary outcome was to determine drain related surgical site infection (DRSSI) rate. Results: A total of 335 LSG were performed in the studied period. In all patients one abdominal drain was placed during surgery. Six GSLL (1.79%) and 5 PB (1.49%) were recorded. Drain placement did not prove to ensure early diagnosis or conservative management of GSLL or PB after LSG. Furthermore, an incidence of DRSSI of 4.1% (14 patients) was found. Conclusion: In our study, no clear diagnostic or therapeutic benefits of the systematic use of drains for GSLL or PB in LSG was found; but drain use did show a considerable rate of DRSSI, which must be taken into consideration prior to considering drain systematic use. While no randomized prospective trials have been performed, the retrospective data does not support drain systematic use.

Indexed as

Anastomotic leakBariatric surgeryBleedingComplications, postoperativeDrainage

Identifiers

PMID38974894
PMCPMC11224003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.