Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38974884›Full record

ReviewThe Japanese dental science review2024

Clinical use of duplicate complete dentures: A narrative review.

Nobuhiro Yoda, Masumi Abe, Hirofumi Yamaguchi, Naomi Tanoue, Tetsuo Yamamori

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Japanese dental science review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advances in 3D Printing for Removable Prosthetics-Insights and Perspectives.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  3. Expert consensus on digital restoration of complete dentures.International journal of oral science · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nobuhiro YodaDivision of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan.
Masumi AbeDivision of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan.
Hirofumi YamaguchiDivision of Advanced Prosthetic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan.
Naomi TanoueDivision of Pediatric Dentistry, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan.
Tetsuo YamamoriDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Ohu University School of Dentistry, 31-1 Misumido, Tomita, Koriyama, Fukushima 963-8611, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most reports on duplicate dentures are introduction to fabrication methods or clinical case reports. Only a few studies have verified their clinical effectiveness; hence, evidence to construct useful clinical guidelines for duplicate denture use is lacking. This review aimed to comprehensively investigate reports on duplicate dentures to accumulate evidences that will contribute to the formulation of clinical practice guidelines. Duplicate dentures are effectively used for impression making and bite registration when fabricating new dentures, thereby reducing the number of clinic visits and treatment time. Duplicate denture can also be used as temporary or new dentures. Older people in whom various adaptive abilities have declined, may find it difficult to adjust to new dentures and experience stress, even if the shape is appropriate. Duplicate dentures, which reproduces the shape of old dentures that they are used to, have the advantage of being more familiar to older people and less stressful. When manufacturing duplicate dentures, digital methods such as milling and three-dimensional printing are superior to conventional methods regarding working time and cost. A notable advantage of the digital method is that the denture shape can be saved as digital data, and the denture can be easily duplicated if lost.

Indexed as

3D printingCAD-CAMDuplicate denture

Identifiers

PMID38974884
PMCPMC11225648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.