ReviewThe Japanese dental science review2024
Clinical use of duplicate complete dentures: A narrative review.
Review in The Japanese dental science review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Performance and Patients' Satisfaction of Digitally Versus Conventionally Fabricated Dentures: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Advances in 3D Printing for Removable Prosthetics-Insights and Perspectives.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Review
- Expert consensus on digital restoration of complete dentures.International journal of oral science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most reports on duplicate dentures are introduction to fabrication methods or clinical case reports. Only a few studies have verified their clinical effectiveness; hence, evidence to construct useful clinical guidelines for duplicate denture use is lacking. This review aimed to comprehensively investigate reports on duplicate dentures to accumulate evidences that will contribute to the formulation of clinical practice guidelines. Duplicate dentures are effectively used for impression making and bite registration when fabricating new dentures, thereby reducing the number of clinic visits and treatment time. Duplicate denture can also be used as temporary or new dentures. Older people in whom various adaptive abilities have declined, may find it difficult to adjust to new dentures and experience stress, even if the shape is appropriate. Duplicate dentures, which reproduces the shape of old dentures that they are used to, have the advantage of being more familiar to older people and less stressful. When manufacturing duplicate dentures, digital methods such as milling and three-dimensional printing are superior to conventional methods regarding working time and cost. A notable advantage of the digital method is that the denture shape can be saved as digital data, and the denture can be easily duplicated if lost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.