ArticleaBIOTECH2024
Fusion of a rice endogenous
Article in aBIOTECH, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coupling of both a transactivation module and a double-stranded DNA-binding domain boosts Cas12i3 variant-based cytosine and adenine editing in plants.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
- The Microtubule-Associated Protein CsTON2 Interacts With CsTRM5 and CsSUN to Regulate Fruit Shape Development in Cucumber.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Engineering a robust Cas12i3 variant-mediated wheat genome editing system.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Unleashing the Potential of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing for Yield-Related Traits in Rice.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Engineering of a new type of plant base editor for simultaneous adenine transition and transversion within the editing window will greatly expand the scope and potential of base editing in directed evolution and crop improvement. Here, we isolated a rice endogenous hypoxanthine excision protein, N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase (OsMPG), and engineered two plant A-to-K (K = G or T) base editors, rAKBE01 and rAKBE02, for simultaneous adenine transition and transversion base editing in rice by fusing OsMPG or its mutant mOsMPG to a plant adenine transition base editor, ABE8e. We further coupled either OsMPG or mOsMPG with a transactivation factor VP64 to generate rAKBE03 and rAKBE04, respectively. Testing these four rAKBEs, at five endogenous loci in rice protoplasts, indicated that rAKBE03 and rAKBE04 enabled higher levels of A-to-G base transitions when compared to ABE8e and ABE8e-VP64. Furthermore, whereas rAKBE01 only enabled A-to-C/T editing at one endogenous locus, in comparison with rAKBE02 and rAKBE03, rAKBE04 could significantly improve the A-to-C/T base transversion efficiencies by up to 6.57- and 1.75-fold in the rice protoplasts, respectively. Moreover, although no stable lines with A-to-C transversion were induced by rAKBE01 and rAKBE04, rAKBE04 could enable simultaneous A-to-G and A-to-T transition and transversion base editing, at all the five target loci, with the efficiencies of A-to-G transition and A-to-T transversion editing ranging from 70.97 to 92.31% and 1.67 to 4.84% in rice stable lines, respectively. Together, these rAKBEs enable different portfolios of editing products and, thus, now expands the potential of base editing in diverse application scenario for crop improvement. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42994-024-00138-8.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.