Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38974715›Full record

ArticleMedComm2024

Li Xu, Min Li, Wu He

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in MedComm, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. MedComm · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Li XuCenter for Drug Evaluation National Medical Products Administration Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5350-6124
Min LiCenter for Drug Evaluation National Medical Products Administration Beijing China.
Wu HeCenter for Drug Evaluation National Medical Products Administration Beijing China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, although severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic has been handled with long-term management globally, the virus strains keep continuous evolution in an uncertain direction. The newly emerged JN.1 dominated the globally circulating variants in a short time and resulted in increasing hospitalizations. Up to 2024, variant vaccines with the composition of XBB sub-lineage were available due to the coordinated efforts of developers and regulatory agencies. The development of updated vaccines is still needed and the regular availability of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines should be timely guaranteed. The current landscape of COVID-19 vaccines and the strategies for accelerating vaccine development and approval are reviewed. Proposals to enhance variants monitoring and the establishment of the strain recommendation mechanism are made. This review provides suggestions about platform technology designation and application, real-world data leveraging and modification to regulatory pathways both for the post-pandemic era of SARS-CoV-2 and for the future unknown pathogen pandemic.

Identifiers

PMID38974715
PMCPMC11224961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.