ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2024
A public health development intervention between acceptability and feasibility: descriptive-interpretive discussion of an example.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: the National Tuberculosis Control Program (NTP) in Cameroon participated between 2016 and 2018 in a multi-country operational study of the Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The UNION) aiming at demonstrating the efficiency and feasibility of systematic tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) with 3 months of an isoniazid/rifampicin (3RH) combination in under-five child contacts of bacilliferous TB patients. Cameroon was one of the participating countries of the study. Despite the promising results communicated following this study, the coverage of TPT with 3RH in Cameroon remains low. We explored the intervention under aspects of acceptability and perceived feasibility. Methods: key participants and stakeholders in this descriptive interpretative study in Cameroon were interviewed in five focus groups or individually (31 individuals). The Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and interview transcripts were analysed for different components of acceptability using a theoretical framework and the results discussed confronting them with the main objective of the study, i.e. demonstrating feasibility. Results: the children's parents expressed overall positive feelings about and acceptance of the intervention, emphasizing the unexpected empathy shown by the health staff. The involved field staff, too, showed unreserved acceptance. On the other hand, managers at the intermediate and central levels showed scepticism as to the process of initiation of the study as well as to its feasibility in the given context, neglecting aspects of resources necessary for a scaling-up and of prioritisation. Conclusion: the adoption of a public health strategy, also internationally recognized as an effective and efficient intervention, requires more than the demonstration of its acceptability or feasibility during the term of a showcase project introduced by an external development partner. Adoption is conditioned by adoption and circumspect planning involving at each stage the stakeholders on all levels of the program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.