ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Predictive value of synaptic plasticity for functional decline in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous research suggested that quadripulse (QPS)-induced synaptic plasticity is associated with both cognitive and motor function in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and does not appear to be reduced compared to healthy controls (HCs). Objective: This study aimed to explore the relationship between the degree of QPS-induced plasticity and clinically significant decline in motor and cognitive functions over time. We hypothesized that MS patients experiencing functional decline would exhibit lower levels of baseline plasticity compared to those without decline. Methods: QPS-induced plasticity was evaluated in 80 MS patients (56 with relapsing-remitting MS and 24 with progressive MS), and 69 age-, sex-, and education-matched HCs. Cognitive and motor functions, as well as overall disability status were evaluated annually over a median follow-up period of 2 years. Clinically meaningful change thresholds were predefined for each outcome measure. Linear mixed-effects models, Cox proportional hazard models, logistic regression, and receiver-operating characteristic analysis were applied to analyse the relationship between baseline plasticity and clinical progression in the symbol digit modalities test, brief visuospatial memory test revised (BVMT-R), nine-hole peg test (NHPT), timed 25-foot walk test, and expanded disability status scale. Results: Overall, the patient cohort showed no clinically relevant change in any functional outcome over time. Variability in performance was observed across time points in both patients and HCs. MS patients who experienced clinically relevant decline in manual dexterity and/or visuospatial learning and memory had significantly lower levels of synaptic plasticity at baseline compared to those without such decline (NHPT: Conclusion: Our study suggests that QPS-induced plasticity could be linked to clinically relevant functional decline in patients with MS. However, to solidify these findings, longer follow-up periods are warranted, especially in cohorts with higher prevalences of functional decline. Additionally, the variability in cognitive performance in both patients with MS and HCs underscores the importance of conducting further research on reliable change based on neuropsychological tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.