ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2024
Intuitive and versatile bionic legs: a perspective on volitional control.
Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing volitional electromyographic control strategies: from proportional mapping to muscle modeling and reflex augmentation.Biomedical engineering letters · 2026Article
- Multimodal fusion-powered English speaking robot.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Active lower limb prostheses show large potential to offer energetic, balance, and versatility improvements to users when compared to passive and semi-active devices. Still, their control remains a major development challenge, with many different approaches existing. This perspective aims at illustrating a future leg prosthesis control approach to improve the everyday life of prosthesis users, while providing a research road map for getting there. Reviewing research on the needs and challenges faced by prosthesis users, we argue for the development of versatile control architectures for lower limb prosthetic devices that grant the wearer full volitional control at all times. To this end, existing control approaches for active lower limb prostheses are divided based on their consideration of volitional user input. The presented methods are discussed in regard to their suitability for universal everyday control involving user volition. Novel combinations of established methods are proposed. This involves the combination of feed-forward motor control signals with simulated feedback loops in prosthesis control, as well as online optimization techniques to individualize the system parameters. To provide more context, developments related to volitional control design are touched on.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.