ArticleSurgical neurology international2024
Intracranial pressure monitoring for severe traumatic brain injury: A retrospective study of 273 consecutive patients.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is essential in severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) cases; yet, the frequency of high ICP occurrences remains debated. This study presents a 9-year analysis of ICP monitoring using intraventricular catheters among sTBI patients. Methods: A retrospective review of 1760 sTBI patients (Glasgow Coma Score <9) admitted between January 2011 and December 2019 was conducted. Of these, 280 patients meeting monitoring criteria were included based on Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) Guidelines. ICP was monitored using intraventricular catheters through right frontal burr holes. Initial ICP readings were recorded intraoperatively, followed by continuous monitoring. Patients with ICP >20 mmHg for 10-15 min during 72 h were categorized with high ICP. Data collected included demographics, computed tomography (CT) findings, intra- and post-operative ICP, and complications. Results: Of 273 patients, 228 were male and 45 females, aged 18-80 (71.30% aged 18-45). Traffic accidents were the primary cause (90.48%). Fifty-two-point seventy-five percent experienced high ICP, correlating significantly with subdural hematoma ( Conclusion: Adherence to BTF guidelines yielded a 52.75% high ICP rate. Significant correlations were found between high ICP and specific CT abnormalities. This study underscores the benefits of ICP monitoring in selected sTBI cases, suggesting a need to review criteria for initiating monitoring protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.