Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38974497›Full record

ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2024

Analysis of antibiotic regimens and outcomes in spinal brucellosis: insights from a retrospective cohort study in Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Abdulaziz S Aljuaid, Sara B Badirah, Rowaina I Abusaeed, Abdulrahman M Almalki, Murouj A Almaghrabi, Emad A Alzahrani, Khalid A Alhazmi, Ammar A Almaghrabi, Abdullmoin M AlQarni, Khalid M Alghamdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdulaziz S AljuaidCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Sara B BadirahCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Rowaina I AbusaeedCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman M AlmalkiCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7266-379X
Murouj A AlmaghrabiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Health, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7357-9269
Emad A AlzahraniCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid A AlhazmiCollege of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Ammar A AlmaghrabiDepartment of Radiology, Al-Noor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullmoin M AlQarniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Al-Noor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid M AlghamdiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Al-Noor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease that is widely spread across the globe, with the number of cases increasing annually. Spinal brucellosis is known to affect about half of patients with brucellosis. Nevertheless, data on the optimal antibiotic regimens for spinal brucellosis are limited. Therefore, this study aims to compare antibiotic treatment regimens for spinal brucellosis at our center in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of an 11-year period from 2010 to 2021 conducted at a single center in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. All patients with spinal brucellosis were included. Patients were excluded if the duration of the received antibiotic regimen or follow-up was poorly documented. Data analysis was conducted using RStudio (R version 4.1.1). Categorical variables of each regimen used by the patients were presented as frequencies and percentages, while numerical variables were summarized using the median and interquartile range (IQR). Results: A total of 35 patients were included; the median (IQR) age of the patients was 58.0 (48.0 to 63.0) years. The most frequently reported symptoms upon admission included low back pain (83.3%). The most frequently administered regimen was the combination of streptomycin + doxycycline + rifampicin (SDR) (20 patients, 55.6%), followed by the combination of streptomycin + rifampicin + trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SRT) (eight patients, 22.2%). Overall, out of the total 35 patients who received first-line treatment, only six patients experienced therapy failure. Out of the total six patients who experienced first-line treatment failure with SDR (five patients, 83%) and SDT (one patient, 17%), surgery was indicated for three patients. Surgical intervention was deemed necessary in 12 patients (34%). Three patients chose not to undergo surgical intervention but still showed complete improvement upon completing the treatment duration. One patient experienced a postoperative complication, resulting in paraplegia. Conclusions: In this study, we found that among 35 patients, treatment failure was observed only in six patients who received triple therapy. In addition, surgical intervention was indicated in 12 patients; however, three patients refused surgery and improved ultimately after changing or extending the duration of the antibiotic regimen.

Indexed as

anti-bacterial agentsBrucellosisspondylitis

Identifiers

PMID38974497
PMCPMC11224780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.