Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38974412›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Patients poorly recognize lesions of concern that are malignant melanomas: is self-screening the correct advice?

Mike Climstein, Jeremy Hudson, Michael Stapelberg, Ian J Miller, Nedeljka Rosic, Paul Coxon, James Furness, Joe Walsh

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Self-skin Examination for Skin Cancer Detection in High-risk Populations: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study and Implications for Cancer Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mike Climstein *Aquatic Based Research, Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Qld, Australia.
Jeremy Hudson *Aquatic Based Research, Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Qld, Australia.
Michael StapelbergAquatic Based Research, Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Qld, Australia.
Ian J MillerAquatic Based Research, Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Qld, Australia.
Nedeljka RosicAquatic Based Research, Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Qld, Australia.
Paul CoxonNorth Queensland Skin Centre, Townsville, Qld, Australia.
James FurnessWater Based Research Unit, Bond University, Robina, Qld, Australia.
Joe WalshSports Science Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

Johnson and Johnson
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Australia is known for its outdoor culture, with a large percentage of its population engaging in outdoor recreational activities, aquatic, non-aquatic and outdoor occupational activities. However, these outdoor enthusiasts face increased exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR), leading to a higher risk of skin cancer, including malignant melanoma (MM). Over the past 40 years, there has been a significant rise in skin cancer rates in Australia, with two out of three Australians expected to develop some form of skin cancer by age 70. Currently, skin cancer examinations are not endorsed in asymptomatic or low-risk individuals in Australia, with only high-risk individuals recommended to undergo regular skin examinations. Notably, the Melanoma Institute Australia suggests that one-half of patients identify MMs themselves, although this claim appears to be based on limited Australian data which may not reflect contemporary practice. Therefore this study sought to determine the percentage of patients who were able to self-identify MMs as lesions of concern when presenting for a skin cancer examination. Methods: Multi-site, cross-sectional study design incorporating a descriptive survey and total body skin cancer screening, including artificial intelligence by a skin cancer doctor. Results: A total of 260 participants with suspect MM lesions were biopsied, with 83 (31.9%) found to be melanomas. Of the true positive MMs only a small percentage of participants (21.7% specificity) correctly had concerns about the suspect lesion being a MM. These MMs were located primarily on the back (44.4%), shoulder (11.1%) and upper leg (11.1%). There was no significant difference in the size between those participants aware of a MM versus those who were not ( Conclusions: Only a small percentage of participants in this study were able to self-identify either

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf-ExaminationArtificial IntelligenceBasal cell carcinomaMalignant melanomaPreventionScreeningSkin cancerSkin neoplasmSquamous cell carcinomaUltraviolet radiation

Identifiers

PMID38974412
PMCPMC11227272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.