ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2024
SDC-DeepLabv3+: Lightweight and Precise Localization Algorithm for Safflower-Harvesting Robots.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A unified EfficientSwinB-based framework for medicinal plant recognition and safflower germplasm classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- LMP-PM: a lightweight multi-path pruning method for plant leaf disease recognition.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- DU-Net-L: an effective and lightweight segmentation model for alfalfa images that integrates the strengths of DeepLabV3+ and U-Net.aBIOTECH · 2025Article
- Continuous Picking Path Planning Based on Lightweight Marigold Corollas Recognition in the Field.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Recognition Method for Marigold Picking Points Based on the Lightweight SCS-YOLO-Seg Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Investigation into the Efficient Cooperative Planning Approach for Dual-Arm Picking Sequences of Dwarf, High-Density Safflowers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Research on detection and location method of safflower filament picking points during the blooming period in unstructured environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Harvesting robots had difficulty extracting filament phenotypes for small, numerous filaments, heavy cross-obscuration, and similar phenotypic characteristics with organs. Robots experience difficulty in localizing under near-colored backgrounds and fuzzy contour features. It cannot accurately harvest filaments for robots. Therefore, a method for detecting and locating filament picking points based on an improved DeepLabv3+ algorithm is proposed in this study. A lightweight network structure, ShuffletNetV2, was used to replace the backbone network Xception of the traditional DeepLabv3+. Convolutional branches for 3 different sampling rates were added to extract information on the safflower features under the receptive field. Convolutional block attention was incorporated into feature extraction at the coding and decoding layers to solve the interference problem of the near-color background in the feature-fusion process. Then, using the region of interest of the safflower branch obtained by the improved DeepLabv3+, an algorithm for filament picking-point localization was designed based on barycenter projection. The tests demonstrated that this method was capable of accurately localizing the filament. The mean pixel accuracy and mean intersection over union of the improved DeepLabv3+ were 95.84% and 96.87%, respectively. The detection rate and weights file size required were superior to those of other algorithms. In the localization test, the depth-measurement distance between the depth camera and target safflower filament was 450 to 510 mm, which minimized the visual-localization error. The average localization and picking success rates were 92.50% and 90.83%, respectively. The results show that the proposed localization method offers a viable approach for accurate harvesting localization.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.