ArticleTranslational and clinical pharmacology2024
Data science through natural language with ChatGPT's Code Interpreter.
Article in Translational and clinical pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Harnessing generative artificial intelligence for periodontitis prediction: a machine learning approach integrating systemic health indicators for precision oral health in resource-limited settings.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- An Investigation Into the Comprehension, Perceptions, Application, and Determinants Affecting the Utilization of Deepseek Artificial Intelligence by Healthcare Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Navigating Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Manuscript Writing: Tips and Traps.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2025Article
- The transformative impact of large language models on medical writing and publishing: current applications, challenges and future directions.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2024Review
- Retrospective modeling study of ChatGPT (GPT 4) warfarin dose adjustment in patients with INRs outside the therapeutic range.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a powerful tool for biomedical researchers, demonstrating remarkable capabilities in understanding and generating human-like text. ChatGPT with its Code Interpreter functionality, an LLM connected with the ability to write and execute code, streamlines data analysis workflows by enabling natural language interactions. Using materials from a previously published tutorial, similar analyses can be performed through conversational interactions with the chatbot, covering data loading and exploration, model development and comparison, permutation feature importance, partial dependence plots, and additional analyses and recommendations. The findings highlight the significant potential of LLMs in assisting researchers with data analysis tasks, allowing them to focus on higher-level aspects of their work. However, there are limitations and potential concerns associated with the use of LLMs, such as the importance of critical thinking, privacy, security, and equitable access to these tools. As LLMs continue to improve and integrate with available tools, data science may experience a transformation similar to the shift from manual to automatic transmission in driving. The advancements in LLMs call for considering the future directions of data science and its education, ensuring that the benefits of these powerful tools are utilized with proper human supervision and responsibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.