Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38974246›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Identification of radiologic and clinicopathologic variables associated with tumor regression pattern and distribution of cancer cells after short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

Alexandre Gheller, Dunya Bachour Basílio, Marília Cristina Rosa da Costa, Sussen Araújo Tuma, Oscar Miguel Túlio Andrade Ferreira, Fernando Gonçalves Lyrio, Daniel da Motta Girardi, João Batista de Sousa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandre GhellerColorectal Surgery Department, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Dunya Bachour BasílioAnatomopathology Department, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Marília Cristina Rosa da CostaAnatomopathology Department, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Sussen Araújo TumaAnatomopathology Department, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Oscar Miguel Túlio Andrade FerreiraColorectal Surgery Department, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Fernando Gonçalves LyrioColorectal Surgery Department, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Daniel da Motta GirardiClinical Oncology Department, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
João Batista de SousaDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, DF, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Knowledge of the pattern of regression and distribution of residual tumor cells may assist in the selection of candidates for rectum-sparing strategies. Objective: To investigate and identify factors associated with tumor regression pattern and distribution of residual tumor cells. Methods: We conducted a prospective study of patients with T3/T4 N0/N+ adenocarcinoma of the middle and lower third of the rectum (≤10 cm) treated with radiotherapy (5×5 Gy) followed by 6 cycles of CAPOX chemotherapy. The pattern of tumor regression was classified as fragmented or solid. Microscopic intramural spread was measured. We used a model of distribution of residual tumor cells not yet applied to rectal cancer, defined as follows: type I (luminal), type II (invasive front), type III (concentric), and type IV (random). Results: Forty patients were included with a median age of 66 years; 23 (57.5%) were men. A fragmented pattern was identified in 18 patients (45.0%), and a solid pattern in 22 (55.0%). Microscopic intramural spread was identified in 25 patients (62.5%), extending from 1 to 18 mm (median, 4 mm). There were 14 cases (35.0%) of microscopic intramural spread ≥10 mm. All cases of fragmented regression pattern, except one, showed microscopic intramural spread. Within the fragmented pattern, microscopic intramural spread was 4-8 mm in 4 cases and ≥10 mm in the remaining cases. All cases of microscopic intramural spread ≥ 10 mm were within the fragmented pattern. Regarding the distribution pattern of residual tumor cells, 11 cases (31.5%) were classified as type I, 14 (40.0%) as type II, 10 (28.5%) as type III, and none as type IV. Carcinoembryonic antigen levels >5 ng/mL, downsizing <50%, residual mucosal abnormality >20 mm, and anatomopathologic lymph node involvement were significantly associated with the occurrence of fragmentation ( Conclusion: The occurrence of a fragmented regression pattern is common, as is the presence of microscopic intramural spread. We could identify radiologic and clinicopathologic factors associated with the pattern of tumor regression and a type I distribution pattern.

Indexed as

distributionfragmentationneoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapyrectal cancertumor response

Identifiers

PMID38974246
PMCPMC11224439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.