Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38974232›Full record

ArticleLeukemia research reports2024

A tertiary care centre experience with Elranatamab: A report of three cases.

Disha Kakkar, Aakanksha Singh, Reshmi Harikumar Pillai, Tribikram Panda, Roy J Palatty, Rohan Halder, Narendra Agrawal, Dinesh Bhurani

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia research reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Disha KakkarDepartment of Haemat-oncology, Rajiv Gandhi cancer institute and research centre, New Delhi, India.
Aakanksha SinghDepartment of Haemat-oncology, Rajiv Gandhi cancer institute and research centre, New Delhi, India.
Reshmi Harikumar PillaiDepartment of Haemat-oncology, Rajiv Gandhi cancer institute and research centre, New Delhi, India.
Tribikram PandaDepartment of Haemat-oncology, Rajiv Gandhi cancer institute and research centre, New Delhi, India.
Roy J PalattyDepartment of Haemat-oncology, Rajiv Gandhi cancer institute and research centre, New Delhi, India.
Rohan HalderDepartment of Haemat-oncology, Rajiv Gandhi cancer institute and research centre, New Delhi, India.
Narendra AgrawalDepartment of Haemat-oncology, Rajiv Gandhi cancer institute and research centre, New Delhi, India.
Dinesh BhuraniDepartment of Haemat-oncology, Rajiv Gandhi cancer institute and research centre, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The introduction of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies has changed the treatment paradigm of multiple myeloma. With the advent of these new therapeutic options, life expectancy has substantially increased for myeloma patients which has led to an increased number of patients with triple-class refractory disease. Thus, there remains an unmet need for effective novel therapies with good tolerability and safety profile. Elranatamab, is the most widely used bispecific antibody currently in the Indian setting. However, it has only been used on a clinical trial basis till now, and real-world data especially in the Indian setting is missing. Here, we present our experience with three cases of multi-line treated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma on elranatamab monotherapy. Case report: We here discuss three of our patients with triple class refractory multiple myeloma who recieved elranatamab monotherapy. While one of our patient had been switched to fortnightly treatment, two patients were still continuing weekly treatment. The common adverse effects observed were grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome, cytopenias, CMV reactivation and hypo-gammaglobulinemia. While two of our patients are doing well, one patient had grade 3 neurological toxicity, likely drug related and succumbed. Discussion: B-cell maturation antigen is highly expressed on mature B cells and is critical for the survival and proliferation of plasma cells. It has emerged as a novel target for anti-myeloma therapies in the form of bispecific cell engager, antibody-drug conjugates, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies.The phase II MM3 trial showed a promising efficacy with an ORR of 61% with a CR rate of >35%. With a median follow-up of 14.7 months, the median PFS was not reached and the 15-month PFS rate was 50.9%. While it is too early to comment on long term survival with the monotherapy, we here discuss response of Indian patients in the real world setting. Conclusion: Elranatamab monotherapy could prove to be an efficacious option for the treatment of relapsed /refractory multiple myeloma patients with triple-class refractory disease, with limited therapeutic options. However, patients need to be screened for infectious complications with appropriate prophylaxis and immunoglobulin replacement, if required. Also, a high suspicion is required for the neurological complications of the drug and a longitudinal neuro-cognitive screening is required for the patients.

Identifiers

PMID38974232
PMCPMC11225023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.