ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Social Community Teams' Creation of Service Integration Through Boundary Work and Play with Their Stakeholders.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Flexibility in rigid systems: a meta-synthesis of best practices for integrated care.BMC primary care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In many European countries, responsibilities for social care have been shifted to municipalities to enhance accessibility and stimulate integration of care and social services, and to cut costs. Multidisciplinary local Social Community Teams (SCTs) have become increasingly responsible for the provision of these integrated services, requiring them to collaborate with local health and societal organisations. To collaborate and to integrate services the SCTs must work across their own and stakeholders' boundaries (e.g., domain specific boundaries). We investigated how boundary work in SCTs' practices contributes to service integration in a dynamic multi-stakeholder context. In our embedded case study, for 18 months, we followed three SCTs in their efforts to integrate services, and used data from multiple sources, including bi-weekly questionnaires in which SCT members reflect on their stakeholder-directed goal achievements. The case analysis yielded four takeaways. First, it demonstrates how SCTs' bottom-up formulation of a long-term service integration vision brought internal coherence (boundary reinforcement), while the short-term action-goals increased collaboration with stakeholders (boundary spanning). Second, only SCTs that managed to incorporate constraints into their action-goals and practices, and to span and play with boundaries, continued with integrating services just-by-doing. Third, two stakeholder characteristics facilitated the SCTs' boundary spanning: well-organized stakeholders and prior familiarity with the stakeholder. Fourth, a new boundary work type emerged, "boundary play", consisting of informal, experimental collaboration efforts with stakeholders contributing to emergent service integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.