Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38974206›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Speaking the Same Language - The Development of a Glossary of Terms for Social Prescribing in Wales.

Simon Newstead, Amrita Jesurasa, Bethan Jenkins, Amber Lavans, Alan Woodall, Carolyn Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simon NewsteadFaculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8896-133X
Amrita JesurasaPublic Health Wales, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0353-5150
Bethan JenkinsPublic Health Wales, UK.
Amber LavansPublic Health Wales, UK.
Alan WoodallPowys Teaching Hospital Board, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2933-0508
Carolyn WallaceFaculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3799-5748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Social prescribing can facilitate the integration of health, social care and community support but has a diverse and confusing terminology that impairs cross-sectoral communication and creates barriers to engagement. Methods: To address this issue a mixed-methods approach that incorporated a scoping review, a group concept mapping study and consultation was employed to identify and classify the terminology associated with social prescribing. The findings were then used to inform the development of a glossary of terms for social prescribing. Results: Many terms are used interchangeably to describe the same specific aspects of social prescribing. Much of the terminology originates from the health and social care literature of England. Discussion: The terminology used in the academic literature may not accurately reflect the terminology used by the social prescribing workforce. The innovative and interactive glossary of terms identifies the terminology associated with social prescribing and provides additional contextual information. The process of developing the dual language glossary presented several considerations and challenges. Conclusion: The glossary of terms will facilitate cross-sector communication and reduce barriers to engagement with social prescribing. It takes an important first step to help clarify and standardise the language associated with social prescribing, for professionals and members of the public alike.

Indexed as

community connectionglossary of termsgroup concept mappinglink workerscoping reviewsocial prescribing

Identifiers

PMID38974206
PMCPMC11225557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.