Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38974204›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Floundering or Flourishing? Early Insights from the Inception of Integrated Care Systems in England.

Bethan Page, Thavapriya Sugavanam, Ray Fitzpatrick, Helen Hogan, Mirza Lalani

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bethan PageCicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9937-6176
Thavapriya SugavanamNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3033-2028
Ray FitzpatrickNuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Helen HoganDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0920-2093
Mirza LalaniDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7851-9062

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In 2022, England embarked on an ambitious and innovative re-organisation to produce an integrated health and care system with a greater focus on improving population health. This study aimed to understand how nascent ICSs are developing and to identify the key challenges and enablers to integration. Methods: Four ICSs participated in the study between November 2021 and May 2022. Semi-structured interviews with system leaders (n = 67) from health, social and voluntary care as well as representatives of local communities were held. A thematic framework approach supported by Leutz's five laws of integration framework was used to analyse the data. Results: The benefits of ICSs include enhancing the delivery of good quality care, improving population health and providing more person-centred care in the community. However, differences between health and social care such as accountability, organisational/professional cultures, risks of duplicating efforts, tensions over funding allocation, issues of data integration and struggles in engaging local communities threaten to hamper integration. Conclusions: Despite ICS's investing in the structural and relational components of integrated care, the unprecedented pressures on systems to reduce demand on primary and emergency care tackling elective backlogs may detract from a key goal of ICSs, improving population health and prevention.

Indexed as

Integrated Care SystemsIntegrationpopulation healthsystem reorganisation

Identifiers

PMID38974204
PMCPMC11225555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.