Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38974188›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2024

CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing of potato

Milla Karlsson, Nam Phuong Kieu, Marit Lenman, Salla Marttila, Svante Resjö, Muhammad Awais Zahid, Erik Andreasson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Genome Editing in Root and Tuber Crop Development in Sub-Saharan Africa.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. From Lab to Field: CRISPRing Major CultivatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Genome editing of susceptibility geneFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing Technology in Potato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Milla KarlssonDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 190, 234 22, Lomma, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7173-2466
Nam Phuong KieuDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 190, 234 22, Lomma, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1690-6379
Marit LenmanDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 190, 234 22, Lomma, Sweden.
Salla MarttilaDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 190, 234 22, Lomma, Sweden.
Svante ResjöDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 190, 234 22, Lomma, Sweden.
Muhammad Awais ZahidDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 190, 234 22, Lomma, Sweden.
Erik AndreassonDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 190, 234 22, Lomma, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0666-7204

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potato is the third most important food crop, but cultivation is challenged by numerous diseases and adverse abiotic conditions. To combat diseases, frequent fungicide application is common. Knocking out susceptibility genes by genome editing could be a durable option to increase resistance.

Identifiers

PMID38974188
PMCPMC11224679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.