Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38974112›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2024

Evaluation of a training program using the SBAR communication tool for caregivers managing acute respiratory distress in lung cancer patients: A pilot randomized controlled trial protocol.

Danielle Reynaud, Guillaume Decormeille, Antoine Tisseaux, René Bun

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05839353 (Evaluation of the Effect of Training in the SBAR), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05839353 unknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of the Effect of Training in the SBAR (Situation Background Assessment Recommendation) Tool on the Feeling of Self-efficacy of Carers of Patients With Lung Cancer in the Face of a Situation of Simulated Respiratory Distress.

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de la RéunionRan2023 to 2025Enrolled32ConditionsCaregiversArmsSBAR training by serious game
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danielle ReynaudDepartment of Nursing, Rehabilitation and Medical Techniques (South Site), University Hospital Center, Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France.
Guillaume DecormeilleCLLE UMR 5263 CNRS, UT2J Laboratory and Institut de Formation en Soins Infirmiers Fondation Leonie Chaptal, Sarcelles, Paris, France.
Antoine TisseauxNational Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Clinical Investigation Center (CIC) 1410 Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Center, Saint Pierre, La Réunion, France.
René BunNational Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Clinical Investigation Center (CIC) 1410 Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Center, Saint Pierre, La Réunion, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Family-based caregivers are increasingly important in the management of non-hospitalized lung cancer patients. However, lack of training can negatively impact care including diagnostic errors that can lead to delays in providing appropriate medical treatment. Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is common symptom of lung cancer and requires urgent intervention as well as adequate communication with healthcare professionals (HCPs) to enable appropriate decision-making and improve patient outcomes. Standardized tools such as the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) tool and its French adaptation SAED, standing for Methods: A monocentric, randomized, controlled, open-label, superiority, parallel-arm trial will be conducted for 18 months with 3 mid-study assessments (NCT05839353). Family caregivers of lung cancer patients will be recruited at the University Hospital Center of Saint Pierre, Reunion Island, France. Participants will be randomized (1:1) into two groups: the experimental group receiving training using the SBAR/SAED tool and standard instructions for managing respiratory distress/dyspnea, and the control group, receiving standard instructions only. The primary outcome will be to determine perceived self-efficacy as measured by the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. Discussion: This study will present a preliminary assessment of training family caregivers in using the SBAR/SAED tool in simulated episodes of ARF in lung cancer patients. Our findings may provide valuable insights into effective training methods for caregivers in critical home care situations and could be widely used for lung cancer management.

Indexed as

Communication toolDigital healthHealthcareSAEDSBARSerious game

Identifiers

PMID38974112
PMCPMC11225351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.