Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38974104›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2024

Aspects of acceptance: building a shared conceptual understanding.

Michael D Mrazek, Bailey R Dow, Justine Richelle, Alexander M Pasch, Nathan Godderis, Talia A Pamensky, Bryce A Rutila, Alissa J Mrazek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Perspectives on ageing acceptance among women in middle adulthood: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael D MrazekSchool of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Austin, TX, United States.
Bailey R DowSchool Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.
Justine RichelleThe Applied Psychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Alexander M PaschThe Applied Psychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Nathan GodderisThe Applied Psychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Talia A PamenskyThe Applied Psychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Bryce A RutilaThe Applied Psychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Alissa J MrazekThe Applied Psychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many contemplatives, scientists, and clinicians have pointed to the value of responding to life's difficulties by accepting experiences as they are. A growing body of research also suggests that acceptance contributes to effective coping with adversity, reduced stress, and improved emotional well-being. Yet within the scientific literature, there is little consensus on what acceptance means or how it should be measured. This makes it nearly impossible to synthesize empirical work on acceptance into a cohesive scientific understanding. Our goal in this paper is to clarify four facets of acceptance that are commonly referenced in research: acknowledging, allowing, non-judging, and non-attachment. We do not propose a specific definition of acceptance or even a set of privileged facets that must be included in future frameworks. We instead offer a vocabulary to facilitate productive communication among researchers that will, in turn, enable a more definitive scientific understanding of this important construct to emerge. After defining and explaining these aspects of acceptance, we further clarify these constructs in two ways. First, we illustrate how the four aspects are dissociable from one another. Second, we analyze their correspondence to related constructs from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). Finally, we provide a concept worksheet that scholars can utilize to precisely operationalize acceptance in their own work.

Indexed as

acceptanceacknowledgementallowingnon-attachmentnon-judgment

Identifiers

PMID38974104
PMCPMC11225620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.