ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2024
Achieving consistency of flexible surface acoustic wave sensors with artificial intelligence.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-precision temperature-strain composite sensing based on a single resonator-type surface acoustic wave sensor using machine learning algorithms.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- Machine learning based real-time assessment of fabrication deviation induced mechanical performance variations in stretchable silicon arrays.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- Research progress in exercise-induced fatigue monitoring and injury early warning based on flexible sensing textiles and deep learning.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Flexible humidity sensors for diverse applications.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Review
- Acoustoelectric Effect due to an In-Depth Inhomogeneous Conductivity Change in ZnO/Fused Silica Substrates.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flexible surface acoustic wave technology has garnered significant attention for wearable electronics and sensing applications. However, the mechanical strains induced by random deformation of these flexible SAWs during sensing often significantly alter the specific sensing signals, causing critical issues such as inconsistency of the sensing results on a curved/flexible surface. To address this challenge, we first developed high-performance AlScN piezoelectric film-based flexible SAW sensors, investigated their response characteristics both theoretically and experimentally under various bending strains and UV illumination conditions, and achieved a high UV sensitivity of 1.71 KHz/(mW/cm²). To ensure reliable and consistent UV detection and eliminate the interference of bending strain on SAW sensors, we proposed using key features within the response signals of a single flexible SAW device to establish a regression model based on machine learning algorithms for precise UV detection under dynamic strain disturbances, successfully decoupling the interference of bending strain from target UV detection. The results indicate that under strain interferences from 0 to 1160 με the model based on the extreme gradient boosting algorithm exhibits optimal UV prediction performance. As a demonstration for practical applications, flexible SAW sensors were adhered to four different locations on spacecraft model surfaces, including flat and three curved surfaces with radii of curvature of 14.5, 11.5, and 5.8 cm. These flexible SAW sensors demonstrated high reliability and consistency in terms of UV sensing performance under random bending conditions, with results consistent with those on a flat surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.