ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2024
Required force for distraction during medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy may serve as a predictive indicator for lateral hinge fracture.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Finite element analysis confirms the optimal apex position in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy to avoid lateral hinge fracture.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Required force for distraction during medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy may serve as a predictive indicator for lateral hinge fracture.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a biological procedure for treating unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. The literature repeatedly highlights the significance of preserving an intact lateral hinge during this procedure. We investigated the temporal course of distraction forces during distraction at the osteotomy site, aiming to quantitatively measure and analyse temporal changes in distraction forces at different distraction points for intact and fractured lateral hinges. Materials and Methods: This biomechanical study was conducted on 10 human cadavers, which were divided into two groups: one with preserved 1 cm intact lateral cortexes (ILCs) and the other with completely osteotomised fractured lateral cortexes (FLCs). An experimental setup was custom designed to facilitate the required force measurement during distraction. The distraction forces were recorded with a force gauge at 0.5-mm intervals throughout the distraction. Results: There was a significant difference between the ILC and FLC groups in distraction forces at all points (8-15 mm). The ILC group consistently exhibited higher distraction force values, with FLC recording values ranging from 8.8% to 13.2% of ILC's. Lateral hinge fractures caused an 86.7% reduction in the initial required force for distraction, significantly impacting the force required for distraction. The ILC group displayed a linear increase in the required distraction force up to 12.5 mm of distraction, which reached 3.7 times the initial value at 12.5 mm of distraction. The FLC group had lower baseline required distraction forces, following a relatively linear trend with more limited increases. Conclusion: FLCs in medial opening wedge osteotomy are associated with significant reductions in the force required for distraction, and a sudden decrease in distraction force during distraction may indicate a lateral hinge fracture. Force measurement devices for use during distraction could offer valuable insights and provide surgeons with immediate warnings for LHFs. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.