Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38973971›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2024

What helps, what hinders?-Focus group findings on barriers and facilitators for mobile service robot use in a psychosocial group therapy for people with dementia.

Catharina Wasic, Robert Erzgräber, Manja Unger-Büttner, Carolin Donath, Hans-Joachim Böhme, Elmar Graessel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catharina WasicFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Services Research in Medicine, Erlangen, Germany.
Robert ErzgräberDepartment of Artificial Intelligence/Cognitive Robotics, Faculty of Informatics/Mathematics, University of Applied Science Dresden (HTW Dresden), Dresden, Germany.
Manja Unger-BüttnerIndependent Researcher, Dresden, Germany.
Carolin DonathFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Services Research in Medicine, Erlangen, Germany.
Hans-Joachim BöhmeDepartment of Artificial Intelligence/Cognitive Robotics, Faculty of Informatics/Mathematics, University of Applied Science Dresden (HTW Dresden), Dresden, Germany.
Elmar GraesselFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Services Research in Medicine, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Many countries are facing a shortage of healthcare workers. Furthermore, healthcare workers are experiencing many stressors, resulting in psychological issues, impaired health, and increased intentions to leave the workplace. In recent years, different technologies have been implemented to lighten workload on healthcare workers, such as electronic patient files. Robotic solutions are still rather uncommon. To help with acceptance and actual use of robots their functionalities should correspond to the users' needs. Method: In the pilot study Care4All-Initial, we developed and field-tested applications for a mobile service robot in a psychosocial, multimodal group therapy for people with dementia. To guide the process and assess possible facilitators and barriers, we conducted a reoccurring focus group including people with dementia, therapists, professional caregivers as well as researchers from different disciplines with a user-centered design approach. The focus group suggested and reviewed applications and discussed ethical implications. We recorded the focus group discussions in writing and used content analysis. Results: The focus group discussed 15 different topics regarding ethical concerns that we used as a framework for the research project: Ethical facilitators were respect for the autonomy of the people with dementia and their proxies regarding participating and data sharing. Furthermore, the robot had to be useful for the therapists and attendees. Ethical barriers were the deception and possible harm of the people with dementia or therapists. The focus group suggested 32 different applications. We implemented 13 applications that centered on the robot interacting with the people with dementia and lightening the workload off the therapists. The implemented applications were facilitated through utilizing existing hard- and software and building on applications. Barriers to implementation were due to hardware, software, or applications not fitting the scope of the project. Discussion: To prevent barriers of robot employment in a group therapy for people with dementia, the robot's applications have to be developed sufficiently for a flawless and safe use, the use of the robot should not cause irritation or agitation, but rather be meaningful and useful to its users. To facilitate the development sufficient time, money, expertise and planning is essential.

Indexed as

dementiafocus groupinstitutional carerobot-assisted therapyuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID38973971
PMCPMC11224299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.