ArticleACS omega2024
Evaluating Molecular Complexity with Open-Source Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Process Mass Intensity.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The application of green chemistry is critical for cultivating environmental responsibility and sustainable practices in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Process mass intensity (PMI) is a key metric that quantifies the resource efficiency of a manufacturing process, but determining what constitutes a successful PMI of a specific molecule is challenging. A recent approach correlated molecular features to a crowdsourced definition of molecular complexity to determine PMI targets. While recent machine learning tools show promise in predicting molecular complexity, a more extensive application could significantly optimize manufacturing processes. To this end, we refine and expand upon the SMART-PMI tool by Sheridan et al. to create an open-source model and application. Our solution emphasizes explainability and parsimony to facilitate a nuanced understanding of prediction and ensure informed decision-making. The resulting model uses four descriptors-the heteroatom count, stereocenter count, unique topological torsion, and connectivity index chi4n-to compute molecular complexity with a comparable 82.6% predictive accuracy and 0.349 RMSE. We develop a corresponding app that takes in structured data files (SDF) to rapidly quantify molecular complexity and provide a PMI target that can be used to drive process development activities. By integrating machine learning explainability and open-source accessibility, we provide flexible tools to advance the field of green chemistry and sustainable pharmaceutical manufacturing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.