Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38973883›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Comparative Analysis of Electrospun Silk Fibroin/Chitosan Sandwich-Structured Scaffolds for Osteo Regeneration: Evaluating Mechanical Properties, Biological Performance, and Drug Release.

Rama Murugapandian, Sundara Ganeasan Mohan, Sridhar T M, N Arunai Nambi Raj, Vijayalakshmi Uthirapathy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rama MurugapandianCentre for Nonlinear Systems, Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai 600069, India.
Sundara Ganeasan MohanDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, University of Madras, Chennai 600025, India.
Sridhar T MDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, University of Madras, Chennai 600025, India.
N Arunai Nambi RajCentre for Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Theragnostic, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632 014, India.
Vijayalakshmi UthirapathyDepartment of Chemistry, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632 014, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0727-4277

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An intensive idea of bone tissue engineering is to design regenerative nanofibrous scaffolds that could afford a natural extracellular matrix (ECM) microenvironment with the ability to induce cell proliferation, biodegradation, sustained drug release, and bioactivity. Even the mechanical properties and orientation of the nanofibers may enhance the performance of the scaffolds. To address this issue, we designed novel sandwich-like hybrid silk fibroin (SF)/silica/poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) nanofibers scaffolds. The developed scaffold was further characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), elemental mapping, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR), and water/blood contact angle measurements. Owing to the interfacial interaction between the layers of organic (chitosan/silk fibroin) and inorganic (silica) in the nanofibrous scaffold, a biocompatibility study has been made on an osteoblast-like (MG63) cell line, which has significant statistical differences; hemocompatibility and the mechanical profile were evaluated in detail to understand the suitability as a biomaterial. To endow the scaffold biodegradation rate, antibacterial activity, porosity profile, and cephalexin monohydrate (CEM), a drug-loading/drug release study was also performed for all of the nanofibers. This strategy explored superior mechanical strength with higher biomineralization on SF/silica/PVA nanofibers. Eventually, the proposed article compared the observation of monolayered scaffolds with designed sandwich-structured scaffolds for the enhancement of bone regeneration.

Identifiers

PMID38973883
PMCPMC11223251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.