ArticleACS omega2024
Comparative Analysis of Electrospun Silk Fibroin/Chitosan Sandwich-Structured Scaffolds for Osteo Regeneration: Evaluating Mechanical Properties, Biological Performance, and Drug Release.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coordination chemistry-enabled drug delivery systems: metal-ligand platforms for controlled release and targeted therapeutics.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Organ-on-chip (OoC) and nano-biomaterials: next generation of precision oral and dental healthcare research.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- The structure and extraction of silk fibroin and its applications in fruit and vegetable preservation: a review.Food chemistry: X · 2026Review
- A comprehensive evaluation on the bioactivity, antibacterial efficacy and cell viability of PVA-PVP-chitosan electrospun scaffolds reinforced with calcium/zinc silicate.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A cell-laden methacrylated chitosan-based photocrosslinkable hydrogel for bone tissue engineering and its in vitro structural and biological characterization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A novel tubular construct using silk fibroin-chitosan scaffold seeded with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for urinary diversion in a preclinical rabbit model.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of the Contribution of Additive Manufacturing toward Orthopedic Applications.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Optimization of Biologically Inspired Electrospun Scaffold for Effective Use in Bone Regenerative Applications.Polymers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An intensive idea of bone tissue engineering is to design regenerative nanofibrous scaffolds that could afford a natural extracellular matrix (ECM) microenvironment with the ability to induce cell proliferation, biodegradation, sustained drug release, and bioactivity. Even the mechanical properties and orientation of the nanofibers may enhance the performance of the scaffolds. To address this issue, we designed novel sandwich-like hybrid silk fibroin (SF)/silica/poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) nanofibers scaffolds. The developed scaffold was further characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), elemental mapping, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR), and water/blood contact angle measurements. Owing to the interfacial interaction between the layers of organic (chitosan/silk fibroin) and inorganic (silica) in the nanofibrous scaffold, a biocompatibility study has been made on an osteoblast-like (MG63) cell line, which has significant statistical differences; hemocompatibility and the mechanical profile were evaluated in detail to understand the suitability as a biomaterial. To endow the scaffold biodegradation rate, antibacterial activity, porosity profile, and cephalexin monohydrate (CEM), a drug-loading/drug release study was also performed for all of the nanofibers. This strategy explored superior mechanical strength with higher biomineralization on SF/silica/PVA nanofibers. Eventually, the proposed article compared the observation of monolayered scaffolds with designed sandwich-structured scaffolds for the enhancement of bone regeneration.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.