ArticleACS omega2024
Investigating Permselectivity in PVDF Mixed Matrix Membranes Using Experimental Optimization, Machine Learning Segmentation, and Statistical Forecasting.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interfacial Thermodynamics of TiACS applied engineering materials · 2026Article
- Development of a Polyvinylidene fluoride-based membrane incorporating magnetic iron-nickel alloy for vacuum membrane distillation desalination.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advances in pervaporation desalination based on polymer membranes.RSC advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research examines the correlation between interfacial characteristics and membrane distillation (MD) performance of copper oxide (Cu) nanoparticle-decorated electrospun carbon nanofibers (CNFs) polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) mixed matrix membranes. The membranes were fabricated by a bottom-up phase inversion method to incorporate a range of concentrations of CNF and Cu + CNF particles in the polymer matrix to tune the porosity, crystallinity, and wettability of the membranes. The resultant membranes were tested for their application in desalination by comparing the water vapor transport and salt rejection rates in the presence of Cu and CNF. Our results demonstrated a 64% increase in water vapor flux and a salt rejection rate of over 99.8% with just 1 wt % loading of Cu + CNF in the PVDF matrix. This was attributed to enhanced chemical heterogeneity, porosity, hydrophobicity, and crystallinity that was confirmed by electron microscopy, tensiometry, and scattering techniques. A machine learning segmentation model was trained on electron microscopy images to obtain the spatial distribution of pores in the membrane. An Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average with Explanatory Variable (ARIMAX) statistical time series model was trained on MD experimental data obtained for various membranes to forecast the membrane performance over an extended duration.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.