ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2024
Effect and prognosis of endoscopic intracranial hematoma removal and hematoma puncture and drainage in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage is one of the most serious complications of hypertension. The treatment focuses on reducing bleeding damage and promoting functional recovery. Aim: This study investigated the efficacy and prognosis of endoscopic intracranial hematoma removal (EIHR) and hematoma puncture and drainage (HPD) in treating hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). Material and methods: Ninety-two patients admitted to our hospital for EIHR and HPD between September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2022 were enrolled, including 14 cases of EIHR (endoscopy group) and 78 cases of HPD (puncture group). The efficacy of the two surgery modes in treating HICH patients was compared. Univariate logistic regression (ULR) and multivariate logistic regression (MLR) were employed to analyze the influences of different treatment methods on the prognosis of patients with HICH. Results: The average hematoma clearance rate (HCR) of all patients was 80.52%, and the patients in the endoscopy group had a higher HCR than those in the puncture group (73.00% vs. 86.00%) (p < 0.001). The good prognosis rate (GPR) shown by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score in the endoscopy group was 69.23%, and that in the puncture group was 40.38%, a large but statistically non-significant difference (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The HCR of EIHR was greatly higher based on that of HPD, but showed no great difference in prognostic effect. The higher the GCS score on admission, the lower the likelihood of poor prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.