Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38973311›Full record

ArticlePain management2024

Epidural spread of surgical site infection from spinal cord stimulation trial.

Taif Mukhdomi, Bennett Andrassy, Semih Gungor

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Pain management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taif MukhdomiPain Labs, New Albany, OH 43054, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1140-4540
Bennett AndrassyPain Labs, New Albany, OH 43054, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-5743-7623
Semih GungorDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY  10021, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4484-9183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a case of deep surgical site infection (SSI) at a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial implantation site, resulting from an allergic reaction to an unknown agent. A 38-year-old female with complex regional pain syndrome began an SCS trial, noting 100% pain relief for 5 days. Fluid drainage from the surgical site was reported on POD6 and trial leads were removed the following day. The patient was hospitalized with sepsis. Blood cultures revealed

Indexed as

Spinal Cord StimulationSurgical Wound InfectionAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsComplex Regional Pain SyndromesEpidural SpaceFemaleHumansStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agentsadhesivecontact dermatitisepidural abscessspinal cord stimulator trialStaphylococcus aureussurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID38973311
PMCPMC11340739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.