ArticleInternational journal of fertility & sterility2024
Association of Working Status with Clinical Pregnancy and Miscarriage among Women undergoing
Article in International journal of fertility & sterility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMiddle-aged working women represent most patients attending fertility clinics for MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this single-centre cross-sectional study at a private clinic in Kazakhstan, we reviewed electronic medical records of all IVF with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles from January 2018 to December 2019 (n=654). 300 cycles in patients with normal ovarian reserve and registered working status of a female partner in the medical records were selected for the analysis. The study's primary outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rates and clinical miscarriage in the first trimester.
results204 women were employed, while 96 were not employed before the start of treatment. The mean age of all patients was 32.2 ± 4.8 years, ranging from 23 to 46 years. Two-thirds of working women had office-based occupations employed as doctors, school and university teachers, accountants, clerks, and managers. One-third of the study participants had manual labor jobs, including service positions and plant workers. There was no association between women's working status and clinical pregnancy rate adjusted for age, antral follicle count, history of pelvic adhesiolysis, and embryo development stage at embryo transfer. However, working women had almost five times the risk of the first trimester miscarriage compared to non-working women [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52 to 4.96] adjusted for age and number of retrieved oocytes.
conclusionWomen who work before commencing IVF treatment can be reassured of having equal chances of conception following the treatment compared to non-working women. The observed risk of first trimester miscarriage in working women necessitates further research before drawing any conclusions from medical and public health points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.