Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38973209›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025

Oral glucose tolerance test-The imperfect gold standard for gestational diabetes screening: A qualitative study involving clinicians in regional, rural and remote areas of Western Australia.

Andrew B Kirke, Erica Spry, David Atkinson, Craig Sinclair, Julia V Marley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Postpartum OGTT Non-Adherence in Regional and Rural Australia: A Longitudinal Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew B KirkeThe Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Bunbury, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1046-5333
Erica SpryThe Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Broome, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7775-3615
David AtkinsonThe Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Broome, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7069-5555
Craig SinclairSchool of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2734-2951
Julia V MarleyThe Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Broome, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1014-4860

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedThe oral glucose tolerance test is the 'gold standard' for detecting gestational diabetes in Australian and International guidelines. Test completion in regional, rural and remote regions may be as low as 50%. We explored challenges and enablers for regional, rural and remote antenatal clinicians providing gestational diabetes screening to better understand low oral glucose tolerance test completion.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews. Participants eligible for the study were doctors or midwives providing antenatal care in regional, rural and remote Western Australia, between August 2019 and November 2020. Interviews were recorded digitally and transcribed into a Word document. We conducted a thematic analysis after initial categorisation and deduction of themes through workshops involving the research team.

resultsWe found a diversity of viewpoints on oral glucose tolerance test reliability for detecting gestational diabetes. Themes that emerged were; good collaboration between antenatal clinicians is required for successful screening; screening occurs throughout pregnancy using various tests; clinicians make significant efforts to address barriers; clinicians prioritise therapeutic relationships.

conclusionsEffective universal screening for gestational diabetes in regional, rural and remote Western Australia is difficult and more complex in practice than guidelines imply. Detecting gestational diabetes requires creative solutions, early identification of at risk women and trust and collaboration between clinicians and women. SO WHAT?: Detection of gestational diabetes in regional, rural and remote Western Australia remains poorly completed. New strategies are required to adequately identify women at risk of adverse birth outcomes relating to hyperglycaemia in pregnancy.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalMass ScreeningAdultFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyPrenatal CareQualitative ResearchReproducibility of ResultsRural Health ServicesRural PopulationWestern Australiaclinical decision makinggestational diabetesobstetric cliniciansoral glucose tolerance testregional, rural and remotescreeningwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID38973209
PMCPMC11729539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.