Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38973060›Full record

ArticleJournal of sex research2024

The Revised Sexual Experiences Survey Victimization Version (SES-V): Conceptualization, Modifications, Items and Scoring.

Mary P Koss, RaeAnn Anderson, Zoë D Peterson, Heather Littleton, Antonia Abbey, Robin Kowalski, Martie Thompson, Sasha Canan, Jacquelyn White, Heather McCauley and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sex research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mary P KossUniversity of Arizona.ORCID 0000-0001-9317-9318
RaeAnn AndersonUniversity of Missouri - Kansas City School of Nursing and Health Sciences.ORCID 0000-0001-9938-0717
Zoë D PetersonIndiana University.ORCID 0000-0003-2975-1062
Heather LittletonUniversity of Colorado Colorado Springs.ORCID 0000-0002-7067-1120
Antonia AbbeyWayne State University.ORCID 0000-0002-5448-4659
Robin KowalskiClemson University.ORCID 0000-0002-9667-3116
Martie ThompsonAppalachian State University.ORCID 0000-0002-5879-9615
Sasha CananUniversity of North Carolina at Wilmington.
Jacquelyn WhiteUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Heather McCauleyMichigan State University.
Lindsay OrchowskiBrown University.ORCID 0000-0001-9048-3576
Lisa FedinaUniversity of Michigan.ORCID 0000-0003-4398-5009
Elise LopezUniversity of Arizona.
Christopher AllenIndependent Researcher.

Funding

Identifying High-Risk Periods and People for Alcohol-Facilitated Sexual Violence Perpetration in College MenK01AA026643 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA · PI ANDERSON, RAEANN · 2018 to 2022
$784k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA026643NIAAA NIH HHS L30 AA027043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Sexual Experiences Survey [SES] is considered the gold standard measure of non-consensual sexual experiences. This article introduces a new victimization version [SES-V] developed by a multidisciplinary collaboration, the first revision since 2007. The 2024 SES-V is designed to measure the construct of sexual exploitation since the 14th birthday. Notable revisions are adoption of a freely given permission standard for non-consent, introduction of new tactics and acts, including made to perform or to penetrate another person's body, tactics-first wording order, and emphasis on gender and sexual orientation inclusivity. The SES-V is modularized to allow whole or partial administration. Modules include Non-contact, Technology-facilitated, Illegal (largely penetrative), and Verbally pressured sexual exploitation. Tables provide item text, multiple scoring approaches, module follow-up, specific incident description and demographics. Future plans include developing a scoring algorithm based on weighting our hypothesized dimensions of sexual exploitation severity: invasiveness, pressure, and norm violation combined with frequency. This article is the first in a special issue on the SES-V. Subsequent articles focus on the taxonomies and literature that informed each module. The issue concludes with two empirical papers demonstrating the feasibility and validity of the SES-V: (1) psychometric comparison with the 2007 SES-SFV; and (2) prevalence data from a census-matched adult community sample.

Indexed as

Crime VictimsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38973060
PMCPMC11981039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.